2 replies on “”

  1. raises some equal protection concerns”

    What were they? He briefly mentioned that the loser could argue Bush v. Gore, in that only a few jurisdictions were being hand-counted, but I didn’t see anything else that remotely qualifies as an equal protection issue. (It’s a losing argument, but heck, it could be made).

    That one sort of qualifies as equal protection… what were the others?

Comments are closed.