Norfolk vs. Vivian.

I simply don’t have the time to do this justice right now, but I don’t want to fail to acknowledge the cease-and-desist order that Norfolk sent to Vivian Page. Signed by Deputy City Attorney Martha P. McGann, it’s a bit stunning in its legal overreach. A kind interpretation would be that Ms. McGann believes that she can bully Vivian. A less kind interpretation would be that got her law degree out of a box of Cracker Jacks, or perhaps Regent. (That’s right: burn.) A valid concern is raised in by the city attorney’s office—how presumably confidential personnel data came to be posted as a comment on Vivian’s site—but the method that they have chosen for sussing that out is totally inappropriate.

Published by Waldo Jaquith

Waldo Jaquith (JAKE-with) is an open government technologist who lives near Char­lottes­­ville, VA, USA. more »

3 replies on “Norfolk vs. Vivian.”

  1. It’s good to see Virginia political bloggers of all parties and political persuasions defending Viv.

  2. Vivian and I don’t agree on very much, but I believe that the Norfolk City Attorney’s office acted poorly on this. And I also believe they owe Vivian an apology. And I said so on my blog.

    Vivian deserved a phone call or an email requesting she consider an edit on the comment. I am sure most of us would have been glad to do such an edit to remove a private person’s name. Such a comment could have a negative impact on the named person.

    I would have to think that most of the state bloggers will have Viv’s back on this one.

Comments are closed.