<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: links for 2010-07-22</title>
	<atom:link href="http://waldo.jaquith.org/blog/2010/07/links-for-2010-07-22/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://waldo.jaquith.org/blog/2010/07/links-for-2010-07-22/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Sep 2010 22:13:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Malena</title>
		<link>http://waldo.jaquith.org/blog/2010/07/links-for-2010-07-22/#comment-25993</link>
		<dc:creator>Malena</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Aug 2010 01:25:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://waldo.jaquith.org/blog/2010/07/links-for-2010-07-22/#comment-25993</guid>
		<description>P.S. The garlic won first place at the county fair. ;-D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>P.S. The garlic won first place at the county fair. ;-D</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Waldo Jaquith</title>
		<link>http://waldo.jaquith.org/blog/2010/07/links-for-2010-07-22/#comment-25967</link>
		<dc:creator>Waldo Jaquith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jul 2010 02:42:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://waldo.jaquith.org/blog/2010/07/links-for-2010-07-22/#comment-25967</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/147760&quot;&gt;*sigh*&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/147760">*sigh*</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael</title>
		<link>http://waldo.jaquith.org/blog/2010/07/links-for-2010-07-22/#comment-25963</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jul 2010 13:45:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://waldo.jaquith.org/blog/2010/07/links-for-2010-07-22/#comment-25963</guid>
		<description>Oooooh, so close. It&#039;s actually named after the late mathematician Clarence A. Waldo who stopped Indiana from re-defining pi. All good mathematicians should have a law named after them. Any resemblance to real blogs, living or dead, is purely coincidental.

But keep holding out hope. Your day will come, I&#039;m sure.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oooooh, so close. It&#8217;s actually named after the late mathematician Clarence A. Waldo who stopped Indiana from re-defining pi. All good mathematicians should have a law named after them. Any resemblance to real blogs, living or dead, is purely coincidental.</p>
<p>But keep holding out hope. Your day will come, I&#8217;m sure.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Waldo Jaquith</title>
		<link>http://waldo.jaquith.org/blog/2010/07/links-for-2010-07-22/#comment-25962</link>
		<dc:creator>Waldo Jaquith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jul 2010 02:42:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://waldo.jaquith.org/blog/2010/07/links-for-2010-07-22/#comment-25962</guid>
		<description>In the voice of Dr. Zoidberg: &quot;Yay, I have a law named after me!&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the voice of Dr. Zoidberg: &#8220;Yay, I have a law named after me!&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael</title>
		<link>http://waldo.jaquith.org/blog/2010/07/links-for-2010-07-22/#comment-25960</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Jul 2010 13:34:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://waldo.jaquith.org/blog/2010/07/links-for-2010-07-22/#comment-25960</guid>
		<description>Well this conversation took an interesting turn.

Waldo&#039;s law: As a discussion on waldo.jaquith.org grows longer, the probability of a comment involving penis shrinking approaches 1.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well this conversation took an interesting turn.</p>
<p>Waldo&#8217;s law: As a discussion on waldo.jaquith.org grows longer, the probability of a comment involving penis shrinking approaches 1.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cecil</title>
		<link>http://waldo.jaquith.org/blog/2010/07/links-for-2010-07-22/#comment-25958</link>
		<dc:creator>Cecil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Jul 2010 22:54:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://waldo.jaquith.org/blog/2010/07/links-for-2010-07-22/#comment-25958</guid>
		<description>No, here&#039;s my favorite quote from the disappearing-penis story:

&quot;Twenty percent came the next day to court and withdrew their complaints, claiming that they had recuperated.&quot;

Or, as they said in Monty Python,

&quot;She turned me into a newt!&quot;

&quot;A newt?&quot;

&quot;Well....I got better.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No, here&#8217;s my favorite quote from the disappearing-penis story:</p>
<p>&#8220;Twenty percent came the next day to court and withdrew their complaints, claiming that they had recuperated.&#8221;</p>
<p>Or, as they said in Monty Python,</p>
<p>&#8220;She turned me into a newt!&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;A newt?&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;Well&#8230;.I got better.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Waldo Jaquith</title>
		<link>http://waldo.jaquith.org/blog/2010/07/links-for-2010-07-22/#comment-25957</link>
		<dc:creator>Waldo Jaquith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Jul 2010 22:44:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://waldo.jaquith.org/blog/2010/07/links-for-2010-07-22/#comment-25957</guid>
		<description>I forgot about that whole African penis-shrinking hysteria. (Though the whole robot comb twist is new to me. :) As I recall, one of the popular ways to shut down a particular accusation was to ask to see the site of the missing member. When it was found to be intact, that was the end of that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I forgot about that whole African penis-shrinking hysteria. (Though the whole robot comb twist is new to me. :) As I recall, one of the popular ways to shut down a particular accusation was to ask to see the site of the missing member. When it was found to be intact, that was the end of that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James</title>
		<link>http://waldo.jaquith.org/blog/2010/07/links-for-2010-07-22/#comment-25956</link>
		<dc:creator>James</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Jul 2010 21:54:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://waldo.jaquith.org/blog/2010/07/links-for-2010-07-22/#comment-25956</guid>
		<description>Don&#039;t worry, it&#039;s all text...

It&#039;s an article about mass hysteria in Sudan, in which men went into a panic believing that their penises were falling off or shrinking back inside their bodies, due to the use of evil or contaminated combs or hair-dryers. The &quot;victims&quot; initially blamed Satan, then on West Africans, and finally the Zionists. Here&#039;s a choice pull-quote:

&quot;Focusing on the report of the Sudanese man who lost his penis after contact with a comb, Abbas wrote: &quot;No doubt, this comb was a laser-controlled surgical robot that penetrates the skull [and passes] to the lower body and emasculates a man!! I wanted to tell that man who fell victim to the electronic comb: &#039;You jackass, how can you put a comb from a man you don&#039;t know to your head, while even relatives avoid using the same comb?!&#039;&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Don&#8217;t worry, it&#8217;s all text&#8230;</p>
<p>It&#8217;s an article about mass hysteria in Sudan, in which men went into a panic believing that their penises were falling off or shrinking back inside their bodies, due to the use of evil or contaminated combs or hair-dryers. The &#8220;victims&#8221; initially blamed Satan, then on West Africans, and finally the Zionists. Here&#8217;s a choice pull-quote:</p>
<p>&#8220;Focusing on the report of the Sudanese man who lost his penis after contact with a comb, Abbas wrote: &#8220;No doubt, this comb was a laser-controlled surgical robot that penetrates the skull [and passes] to the lower body and emasculates a man!! I wanted to tell that man who fell victim to the electronic comb: &#8216;You jackass, how can you put a comb from a man you don&#8217;t know to your head, while even relatives avoid using the same comb?!&#8217;&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Waldo Jaquith</title>
		<link>http://waldo.jaquith.org/blog/2010/07/links-for-2010-07-22/#comment-25955</link>
		<dc:creator>Waldo Jaquith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Jul 2010 21:29:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://waldo.jaquith.org/blog/2010/07/links-for-2010-07-22/#comment-25955</guid>
		<description>I am definitely not following that link.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am definitely not following that link.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James</title>
		<link>http://waldo.jaquith.org/blog/2010/07/links-for-2010-07-22/#comment-25954</link>
		<dc:creator>James</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Jul 2010 17:37:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://waldo.jaquith.org/blog/2010/07/links-for-2010-07-22/#comment-25954</guid>
		<description>Michael - 
If you like Fan Death, then you&#039;ll LOVE the penis-melting Zionist robot combs:

http://www.memri.org/report/en/0/0/0/0/0/0/976.htm</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Michael &#8211;<br />
If you like Fan Death, then you&#8217;ll LOVE the penis-melting Zionist robot combs:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.memri.org/report/en/0/0/0/0/0/0/976.htm">http://www.memri.org/report/en/0/0/0/0/0/0/976.htm</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lonnie Murray</title>
		<link>http://waldo.jaquith.org/blog/2010/07/links-for-2010-07-22/#comment-25953</link>
		<dc:creator>Lonnie Murray</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Jul 2010 14:01:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://waldo.jaquith.org/blog/2010/07/links-for-2010-07-22/#comment-25953</guid>
		<description>You guessed it, Winston Churchill. Pretty amusing photo.

Yeah, the marketing of something like biodynamics as super organic (or even the marketing of it at all), seems quite wrong to me too.  Greenwashing may be a strong term though, since I usually think of that term being used to describe covering up some environmental misdeed with some clever PR trick.  In this case, at least they are organic even if there is some elf poop involved. 

Speaking of greenwashing, here&#039;s an easy way to spot it.  Any time you hear any company on television or radio make some sort of proclamation about how they are helping the environment you pretty much know they&#039;re doing something bad - usually in inverse proportion to how great they claim they are.

The interesting thing to me though is that a lot of this 19th century philosophy continues to play such a huge role in society.  The people involved were almost always very colorful and imaginative people, and like Steiner often believed some wild things.  Nonetheless, sometimes that&#039;s what is necessary to move society forward. It&#039;s also typically far less interesting to see what these people came up with, than to see what &lt;i&gt;other&lt;/i&gt; people did with it later.  In the case of Steiner, it also led one of his follower to start the &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Camphill_Movement&quot;&gt;Camp Hill movement&lt;/a&gt; which provides life-sharing communities for people with disabilities.

For that matter, it&#039;s also important to note that these clear lines we seem to draw between science, magic and religion were not so clear prior to the 20th century.  Respected scientists like Isaac Newton often were quite involved in astrology, alchemy and summoning spirits and in Newton&#039;s case, his discoveries in physics were considered incidental to what he felt was his main work.  For that matter, our modern definition of &quot;magic&quot; is quite different from the 19th century one, which did not assume that it was necessarily supernatural nor unexplainable.   In that sense, modern science tries to pretend that it was an orphan adopted by the modern age, while it maintains a significant amount of the occult in its attic left over from it&#039;s parents.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You guessed it, Winston Churchill. Pretty amusing photo.</p>
<p>Yeah, the marketing of something like biodynamics as super organic (or even the marketing of it at all), seems quite wrong to me too.  Greenwashing may be a strong term though, since I usually think of that term being used to describe covering up some environmental misdeed with some clever PR trick.  In this case, at least they are organic even if there is some elf poop involved. </p>
<p>Speaking of greenwashing, here&#8217;s an easy way to spot it.  Any time you hear any company on television or radio make some sort of proclamation about how they are helping the environment you pretty much know they&#8217;re doing something bad &#8211; usually in inverse proportion to how great they claim they are.</p>
<p>The interesting thing to me though is that a lot of this 19th century philosophy continues to play such a huge role in society.  The people involved were almost always very colorful and imaginative people, and like Steiner often believed some wild things.  Nonetheless, sometimes that&#8217;s what is necessary to move society forward. It&#8217;s also typically far less interesting to see what these people came up with, than to see what <i>other</i> people did with it later.  In the case of Steiner, it also led one of his follower to start the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Camphill_Movement">Camp Hill movement</a> which provides life-sharing communities for people with disabilities.</p>
<p>For that matter, it&#8217;s also important to note that these clear lines we seem to draw between science, magic and religion were not so clear prior to the 20th century.  Respected scientists like Isaac Newton often were quite involved in astrology, alchemy and summoning spirits and in Newton&#8217;s case, his discoveries in physics were considered incidental to what he felt was his main work.  For that matter, our modern definition of &#8220;magic&#8221; is quite different from the 19th century one, which did not assume that it was necessarily supernatural nor unexplainable.   In that sense, modern science tries to pretend that it was an orphan adopted by the modern age, while it maintains a significant amount of the occult in its attic left over from it&#8217;s parents.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cecil</title>
		<link>http://waldo.jaquith.org/blog/2010/07/links-for-2010-07-22/#comment-25952</link>
		<dc:creator>Cecil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Jul 2010 00:55:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://waldo.jaquith.org/blog/2010/07/links-for-2010-07-22/#comment-25952</guid>
		<description>FWIW &amp; IMHO, the Montessori method rocks. I can&#039;t speak to the virtues of the Waldorf approach. But Montessori got it right, IMHO.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>FWIW &amp; IMHO, the Montessori method rocks. I can&#8217;t speak to the virtues of the Waldorf approach. But Montessori got it right, IMHO.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Waldo Jaquith</title>
		<link>http://waldo.jaquith.org/blog/2010/07/links-for-2010-07-22/#comment-25951</link>
		<dc:creator>Waldo Jaquith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Jul 2010 00:32:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://waldo.jaquith.org/blog/2010/07/links-for-2010-07-22/#comment-25951</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Waldo, Rudolf Steiner is the dude behind the Waldorf method. Maria Montessori is behind Montessori schools.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

D&#039;oh—I looked that up, read about the two people, the two educational methods, came back here, and &lt;em&gt;still&lt;/em&gt; wrote the wrong thing. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Waldo, Rudolf Steiner is the dude behind the Waldorf method. Maria Montessori is behind Montessori schools.</p></blockquote>
<p>D&#8217;oh—I looked that up, read about the two people, the two educational methods, came back here, and <em>still</em> wrote the wrong thing. :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cecil</title>
		<link>http://waldo.jaquith.org/blog/2010/07/links-for-2010-07-22/#comment-25950</link>
		<dc:creator>Cecil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Jul 2010 23:09:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://waldo.jaquith.org/blog/2010/07/links-for-2010-07-22/#comment-25950</guid>
		<description>Waldo, Rudolf Steiner is the dude behind the Waldorf method. Maria Montessori is behind Montessori schools.

Gotta go harvest my cherry tomatoes. No elf poop involved.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Waldo, Rudolf Steiner is the dude behind the Waldorf method. Maria Montessori is behind Montessori schools.</p>
<p>Gotta go harvest my cherry tomatoes. No elf poop involved.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Waldo Jaquith</title>
		<link>http://waldo.jaquith.org/blog/2010/07/links-for-2010-07-22/#comment-25949</link>
		<dc:creator>Waldo Jaquith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Jul 2010 22:37:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://waldo.jaquith.org/blog/2010/07/links-for-2010-07-22/#comment-25949</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;As far as I can tell, Steiner had some good ideas, some really bad ideas and some relatively harmless ones.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Oh, surely. Montessouri schools seem to have worked out very nicely. :)

FWIW, I think that this biodynamics thing is well within the realm of bad as it&#039;s practiced. It&#039;s one thing for somebody to go sprinking elf poop on their own crops. I don&#039;t care. After all, what&#039;s it to me? But it&#039;s this &quot;more organic than organic&quot; business that I find reprehensible. If the folks selling biodynamics thought that people wanted what they&#039;re offering, they&#039;d be up front about what they&#039;re doing. Instead, they pretend that it&#039;s some sort of super-organic practice when, instead, it&#039;s this spirit world business. That&#039;s deceptive, and that&#039;s wrong. It&#039;s greenwashing.

&lt;blockquote&gt;On a lighter note, and an example of sorts, can you guess which repected wartime leader liked to dance around at stonehenge with Druids?&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Is that a younger, thinner Winston Churchill?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>As far as I can tell, Steiner had some good ideas, some really bad ideas and some relatively harmless ones.</p></blockquote>
<p>Oh, surely. Montessouri schools seem to have worked out very nicely. :)</p>
<p>FWIW, I think that this biodynamics thing is well within the realm of bad as it&#8217;s practiced. It&#8217;s one thing for somebody to go sprinking elf poop on their own crops. I don&#8217;t care. After all, what&#8217;s it to me? But it&#8217;s this &#8220;more organic than organic&#8221; business that I find reprehensible. If the folks selling biodynamics thought that people wanted what they&#8217;re offering, they&#8217;d be up front about what they&#8217;re doing. Instead, they pretend that it&#8217;s some sort of super-organic practice when, instead, it&#8217;s this spirit world business. That&#8217;s deceptive, and that&#8217;s wrong. It&#8217;s greenwashing.</p>
<blockquote><p>On a lighter note, and an example of sorts, can you guess which repected wartime leader liked to dance around at stonehenge with Druids?</p></blockquote>
<p>Is that a younger, thinner Winston Churchill?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
