Waldo Jaquith

Some questions for Bonner & Associates.

Having chewed over the story all day, I’ve come to suspect strongly that this business of a lobbying firm forging letters sent to Rep. Tom Perriello’s office could well be a Big Story™, the sort of thing that turns out to snake into the offices of elected officials, businesses, and lobbyists across the country. It’s possible that Bonner & Associates’s excuse is true—that some employee, all by himself, decided it might be fun to send fraudulent letters to a member of congress. But I think it’s significantly more likely that it’s not true, in which case a whole host of questions are raised.

If I were a reporter looking into this story, I’d want to get the following questions answered:

Here’s hoping we start seeing these answers soon. If Bonner doesn’t start talking, they’re going to find themselves the subject of a federal inquiry.


4 Comments

Also, would a letter from the “NAACP” change Perriello’s mind?
Obviously, he gets lots of letters from throughout the district and country on an issue like this. The staff probably just puts them in a “Yes” or “No” pile. If it’s noteworthy, it might get mentioned to a higher-level staffer.

Posted by Mike on 1 August 02009 @ 9am

A single letter wouldn’t change a congressman’s mind, by itself. But the logo of a major organization at the top of a letter is definitely a “force multiplier”: if I thought I was getting a letter representing an official position of an organization like the NAACP or the Sierra Club, I would give it a lot more weight than a single letter from Joe Citizen. Which is why someone bothered to forge the letterhead in the first place.

Posted by David Sewell on 1 August 02009 @ 9am

Otherwise, what would ever be the point of contacting an elected official to express your opinion?

Posted by Waldo Jaquith on 1 August 02009 @ 10am

The cynic in me says there ISN’T ever a point.

Posted by Henn W. on 1 August 02009 @ 10am