I was rooting for Brian Moran, but I’m far more enthusiastic about Creigh Deeds than I was at the time about Tim Kaine and even Mark Warner. Joe Abbey ran a great campaign, and I hope Deeds’ coffers are filling quickly enough that they can hire back those laid off staffers and many more.

(Waldo) From the SBE website: 320,159 of 5,071,226 total voters – (6.313%).

Tyler, you apparently didn’t read my reply. Give it another try.

2. (Cline) From Webster’s, “Mandate: 2. The wishes of a political electorate expressed by election results to its representatives…” (Should not be confused with, overwhelming mandate).

3. (Landers) It is not, “sour grapes” to point out that Creigh Deeds has had difficulty in the past raising money and that he could remedy the problem, in part, by repairing his relationship with groups that he previously and mistakenly deemed as politically incorrect, like the UDC and SCV. I know first hand that thousands of Virginia SCV members would like to support Creigh, but they still remember how vociferously he opposed the SCV logo license plate a few years ago. A group that is based on promoting the accurate telling of history has a long memory, and Creigh would be wise to at least try to rebuild a relationship with the SCV, a group that is worth 50,000 votes in the Commonwealth.

As for cash donations, I used to give money, but I didn’t like what some of the campaigns used the money for. I used to support both Republicans and Democrats, but I have not financially supported Republicans since I saw what the Bushies were doing to our Constitution. Now, I will work as a paid staff member, provide in-kind donations, or provide my time as a ballot petition gatherer to candidates who are pledged to Constitution-based governance. When I provide time or material support, I find that I can have a more constructive impact, than with mere financial donations. I have discovered that my in-kind donations are rarely recorded, however, but that is not of consequence to me, since I know the time, material and effort were well spent. For example, when I organized the, Bike for Obama event in Richmond last year, the whole effort cost very little cash, but we managed to get about 1,000 folks to ride their bikes to the Richmond Coliseum to hear Obama’s speech.

I will consider making a cash donation to Deeds’ campaign if I see some effort on his part to rebuild a positive relationship with Virginia’s SCV, UDC and other civic/historic societies. Virginia could be making a billion dollars in added tourism revenue by promoting Confederate era tourism. We can’t get there if the Governor is afraid to have the Battle Flag displayed in public and proclaims that we should be ashamed of our Confederate Veterans, rather than honoring their service to the citizens of Virginia. Nobody expects Deeds to kowtow to the SCV, all they want is to be treated equally with all of the other civic/historic service organizations.

People kept trying to tell me otherwise, but I stubbornly kept saying, “Nonsense! No one will ever out-crazy James Young in the comments on Waldo’s blog!”

This was one of the most exciting and resonant landslide victories in Virginia political history.

There are huge lessons here for VA Dems, like:
* if you want to win statewide, fight everywhere.
* despite trending blue, this is still Virginia.
The “Ol’ Virginny” may be dead, but it’s still got agriculture as its number one industry and an honest and humble public servant can carry a message of economic justice and universal opportunity to every corner of the commonwealth.

As a Terry supporter, I am 100% overjoyed to have Creigh Deeds as our nominee. And as one of those C’ville muckety mucks who watched Creigh gracefully succeed Emily Couric those years ago, I’m 110% sure it’s GAME ON for November.

DEEDS NOT WORDS!

Why would Creigh have anemic funding for this race? In 2005 he was down-ticket, in a national climate in which Democrats had been losing for a long time and fund-raising was very difficult. It wasn’t until 2006 that the party became really resurgent and the cash started flowing.

Creigh was out-spent something like 3 to 1 in 2005, but he still came within around 300 votes of winning. This year, he’s at the top of the ticket and its going to be a lot easier for him to raise money.

If you’re so damn concerned about how much money Creigh is going to have for this general election, then put your money where your mouth is and donate some money to him.

https://deedsforvirginia.ngphost.com/crmapi/contribute

As for your sour grapes BS about Creigh not having enough of a ‘mandate’ in this primary, stop whining. Your candidate (whomever it was) lost, and he lost in a landslide. Creigh beat each of the other candidates by a 2 to 1 margin. Turnout was typical for a Virginia state-level primary. If anything, it was higher than even the 2006 primary in which Jim Webb won the nomination for Senate. Did Jim Webb lack some kind of legitimacy because of low turnout? No.

Waldo, I thought I saw you at the party at the Omni tonight, but by the time I made it over to your side of the room you had evaporated. I never would have thought one of the tallest guys in the room could disappear so completely.

We had my 5-year-old niece with me, and I spent a lot of time crouched over or off playing with her on the steps to the stage. :)

Also, it’s Buena Vista.

Oops! Thanks. Though I kinda like the idea of “Vuena Vista.” It sounds awfully exotic.

Creigh Deeds, who received the “mandate” of less than seven (7) percent of those eligible to vote in the Democratic Primary.

What Ben said, plus 7% isn’t even close to accurate. That’s the percentage of all registered voters in Virginia. If you figure Democrats make up 50% of the electorate (it’s surely less, but I’m being conservative here) then there was 14% turnout. If you think Dems are just below 40%, then it was 20% turnout.

Creigh Deeds, who received the “mandate” of less than seven (7) percent of those eligible to vote in the Democratic Primary.

First, who are you quoting on “mandate”? Has someone claimed Deeds has a mandate? (FWIW, I’m not even sure what that means in the context of a primary).

Second, addressing the 7% of eligible voters thing, is that abnormal in an off-year Democratic gubernatorial primary without a Republican primary? That number is not too surprising to me, given that primaries are usually relatively low turn-out, off-year elections usually have low turnout, and I wouldn’t expect a significant portion of the state’s Republicans or even independents to turn out for the Democratic primary.

Basically, it looks to me like you’re batting at strawmen.

Me, I’m not looking a victory like this in the mouth until the chickens have been counted and the barn door closed.

Or something like that.