Waldo Jaquith

Rep. Ellison sworn in on Jefferson’s Koran; world ends.

Rep. Ellison
Rep. Ellison is sworn in on a Koran once owned by Thomas Jefferson in a private ceremony today, shortly before devouring House Speaker Nancy Pelosi and killing everyone within sight.

O noes! Was that the sound of the earth rending? The endtimes are upon us! Flee from the country! Abandon it to the Islamic hordes! Or remain and accept Muhammad! Aiiieee!

(Via Think Progress)


18 Comments

Great politics with the Jefferson Koran. Still, I’ll bet dollars to doughnuts he’s a one-termer - like GFA.

Posted by Judge Smails on 4 January 2007 @ 7pm

I have to say, I laughed out loud seeing someone above the age of 23 write “noes.” Its a good laugh, though.

Posted by Joe on 4 January 2007 @ 8pm

I knew you would do that Waldo- Good stuff.
Ya da man !
Ismail

Posted by Ismail on 4 January 2007 @ 9pm

I’d bet my doughnuts and my dollars that Rep. Ellison will be a multi-termer, since he’s from a reliable Democratic district. All he has to do is be a good Democrat and not get primaried.

Posted by Neal on 4 January 2007 @ 9pm

[...] Somehow, the gays will get blamed for this too. [...]

Posted by The Daily WhackJob» Blog Archive » Whackjob Roundup - 01/04/07 - Gay Blame Game Edition on 4 January 2007 @ 10pm

“I’d bet my doughnuts and my dollars that Rep. Ellison will be a multi-termer, since he’s from a reliable Democratic district.”

And don’t you think the good people from Rep. Ellison’s district are getting a little pissed that dipwits like Goode think they are stupid terrorist lovers? They’d probably send him back just as a big F you to people like Goode.

But six years is a long way away.

Posted by va displaced on 4 January 2007 @ 11pm

Good stuff.

Posted by Samhensel on 5 January 2007 @ 12am

Well, it’s two years, but, point taken.

Perhaps it might be a six year term for Mr. Ellison someday. That’d be neat.

Posted by Dan Kachur on 5 January 2007 @ 12am

As a resident of the district that sent Congressman (Damn, saying that feels so good!) Ellison to Washington, I can say that unless he goes on the floor of the house to praise Osama Bin Laden, is found with a dead girl or a live boy, or becomes a Republican, that the seat is Keith’s until he doesn’t want it anymore (see: Don Fraser, Martin Sabo)

Sean

Posted by Sean on 5 January 2007 @ 9am

The muslims ARE taking over:

http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/nation/la-010407ambassador,0,4906353.story?coll=la-home-headlines

I wonder if he “uses” the Koran in anyway?

What on earth are the righties going to say about this?

Posted by Jon Sheridan on 5 January 2007 @ 9am

“Well, it’s two years, but, point taken.”

Somehow, I had the Senate on my mind — duh! Thanks for pointing it out …

Posted by va displaced on 5 January 2007 @ 9am

The muslims ARE taking over

Well, naturally. There has been a rise in the interest in the Islamic religion since 9/11, and not all Muslims are violent, jihadist nuts, just like not all Christians are charismatic, fundamentalist flakes.

The more you understand a thing, the less there is to fear from it.

Somewhere along the way in these discussions, someone brought up Rep. Ellison in the context of Louis Farrakhan. Farrakhan does not scare me. In fact, I admire his vision and will to create a better, more productive, and powerful cultural structure for African-Americans. Our society has visited upon that community a wholesale repression of respect for their contributions to our national whole as individuals and as a cultural group. In contrast, Farrakhan has spent his life giving them a foundation on which they can be proud to stand. A person may not like that his morals are Islamic, but no one can deny that he has been one of the most effective motivators the American black community has ever produced.

Even if Ellison turned out to be a duplicate Farrakhan–and he probably won’t because he seems much less angry in his attitude and much more diplomatic in his public skill-set–that would not be necessarily a bad thing.

Posted by TLPatten on 5 January 2007 @ 10am

My only question is why is he being sworn in on Jefferson’s copy of the Koran? Shouldn’t that thing be in a museum somewhere covered by a glass case so no harmful contaminates can get ruin the Koran. I couldn’t care less if Ellison is sworn in using a copy of the holy papers from the Church of the Flying Spaghetti monster; I just question why we are using this copy of the Koran to for Ellison to be sworn in to Congress.

Posted by Matt on 5 January 2007 @ 10am

Shouldn’t that thing be in a museum somewhere covered by a glass case so no harmful contaminates can get ruin the Koran.

Matt: That’s exactly right. This thing is kept under lock-and-key (like everything else) in the Rare Books and Special Collections Division of the Library of Congress. You better believe they didn’t take this “lending” lightly. There was an interesting piece about it yesterday on NPR’s All Things Considered.

Posted by mandy on 5 January 2007 @ 11am

PS: ‘Er, that was on NPR on Wednesday; didn’t hear it until yesterday. ::shrugs:: And, Waldo? Your caption under the pic above is *hilarious*. Calls for a roflmao.

Posted by mandy on 5 January 2007 @ 12pm

The implication coming out of blogs and news reports is that Jefferson cherished his Qu’ran and glowingly approved of its contents. This seems a very dubious proposition.

I had a professor at UNC who was Jewish and taught various history and religion courses. He had a copy of Mein Kampf on his bookshelf. Does that mean he endorsed it?

Posted by bluedog on 5 January 2007 @ 10pm

The implication coming out of blogs and news reports is that Jefferson cherished his Qu’ran and glowingly approved of its contents. This seems a very dubious proposition.

That’s your inference, but it’s not my implication.

Posted by Waldo Jaquith on 5 January 2007 @ 10pm

My bet that Ellison only lasts one term is based on my belief that he’ll leap down the same hole that many Muslim “leaders” in this country seem to have a hard time avoiding - sympathy with, or an unwillingness to issue full-throated condemnations of, Islamic terrorism. See Farrakhan and the CAIR gang.

Many of them seem genetically unable to condemn the latest round of suicide bombers blowing up buses and restaurants without adding a bite about the plight of the Palestinians or the unequal distribution of wealth or some other nonsense about “root causes.” Americans generally bristle at that kind of equivocation in the face of grandmothers being blown to smithereens by plastic explosives wrapped in ball bearings. See Rudy Guliani and bin Alaweed (sp).

I must admit that I know next to nothing of Ellison and was pretty impressed with the class and grace with which he handled the whole Goode thing. Maybe he’s not cut from the same cloth as these people who can’t mention the Holocaust without noting that 20 million other people also died in WWII, so why get hung up on the Jews. But I doubt it.

Posted by Judge Smails on 7 January 2007 @ 3pm