<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Mike Stark assaulted by Allen campaign employees.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://waldo.jaquith.org/blog/2006/10/stark-allen-assault/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://waldo.jaquith.org/blog/2006/10/stark-allen-assault/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 04:44:56 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: TM Lutas</title>
		<link>http://waldo.jaquith.org/blog/2006/10/stark-allen-assault/#comment-11145</link>
		<dc:creator>TM Lutas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Nov 2006 04:39:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://waldo.jaquith.org/blog/2006/10/stark-allen-fight/#comment-11145</guid>
		<description>Headline&#039;s a bit nasty but thank you for asking the question. I stumbled across this thread as I was researching a reply to my cousin talking about this incident. 

In the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dDcp4t5BiPY&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;CNN tape&lt;/a&gt;, timestamp 0:22-0:23 Stark pretty clearly bumps into man #3 above who says &quot;you&#039;re going to need to leave, now. Get out the door.&quot; In most jurisdictions, man #3 could file charges for battery. He&#039;d be a complete tool for doing so but a common compromise is to insist that the guy committing the battery (Stark in this case) leave, right then, at that moment (0:25 on the YouTube CNN video I linked). The first subsequent contact after the initial battery is a small hand shove back by man #3 at timestamp 0:26 followed very quickly by the much younger man #2 getting Stark away from the balding, pudgy 50+ man #3 before things went tragic. Had Stark not shouted out his question at timestamp 0:31 and ticked off man #3, he wouldn&#039;t have ended up with his face pressed up against the glass wall. 

So man #3 is a local and isn&#039;t on the staff and behaved unprofessionally. Man #2 did his best to defuse a situation before it degenerated into an all out brawl and it&#039;s a reasonable construction that he was doing his best to behave professionally and properly and just plain missed a hold. As is noted, he&#039;s a staffer, not a security professional. 

What man #1 was doing is just plain unclear. 

Things get unstable, wacky out in the field. Partisans on the left are ignoring the plain meaning of the words man #3 said, that he&#039;s not part of the campaign (or, more charitably, they saw the &quot;massaged&quot; NBC video and not the better, more raw CNN one). 

Once you wrap your head around the fact that maybe these three guys aren&#039;t exactly working together, the big thuggish conspiracy falls apart and you have a leftie bumping the wrong 50 year old middle manager and people trying to douse the incident before it went very bad. 

I still can&#039;t believe this incident was cited by Olberman as evidence of incipient fascism in America.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Headline&#8217;s a bit nasty but thank you for asking the question. I stumbled across this thread as I was researching a reply to my cousin talking about this incident. </p>
<p>In the <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dDcp4t5BiPY">CNN tape</a>, timestamp 0:22-0:23 Stark pretty clearly bumps into man #3 above who says &#8220;you&#8217;re going to need to leave, now. Get out the door.&#8221; In most jurisdictions, man #3 could file charges for battery. He&#8217;d be a complete tool for doing so but a common compromise is to insist that the guy committing the battery (Stark in this case) leave, right then, at that moment (0:25 on the YouTube CNN video I linked). The first subsequent contact after the initial battery is a small hand shove back by man #3 at timestamp 0:26 followed very quickly by the much younger man #2 getting Stark away from the balding, pudgy 50+ man #3 before things went tragic. Had Stark not shouted out his question at timestamp 0:31 and ticked off man #3, he wouldn&#8217;t have ended up with his face pressed up against the glass wall. </p>
<p>So man #3 is a local and isn&#8217;t on the staff and behaved unprofessionally. Man #2 did his best to defuse a situation before it degenerated into an all out brawl and it&#8217;s a reasonable construction that he was doing his best to behave professionally and properly and just plain missed a hold. As is noted, he&#8217;s a staffer, not a security professional. </p>
<p>What man #1 was doing is just plain unclear. </p>
<p>Things get unstable, wacky out in the field. Partisans on the left are ignoring the plain meaning of the words man #3 said, that he&#8217;s not part of the campaign (or, more charitably, they saw the &#8220;massaged&#8221; NBC video and not the better, more raw CNN one). </p>
<p>Once you wrap your head around the fact that maybe these three guys aren&#8217;t exactly working together, the big thuggish conspiracy falls apart and you have a leftie bumping the wrong 50 year old middle manager and people trying to douse the incident before it went very bad. </p>
<p>I still can&#8217;t believe this incident was cited by Olberman as evidence of incipient fascism in America.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Deb</title>
		<link>http://waldo.jaquith.org/blog/2006/10/stark-allen-assault/#comment-10900</link>
		<dc:creator>Deb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Nov 2006 20:40:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://waldo.jaquith.org/blog/2006/10/stark-allen-fight/#comment-10900</guid>
		<description>Wow, MDcraig...do you write for FOX NEWS...you should really look into it, just the right amount of spin!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow, MDcraig&#8230;do you write for FOX NEWS&#8230;you should really look into it, just the right amount of spin!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Brooks</title>
		<link>http://waldo.jaquith.org/blog/2006/10/stark-allen-assault/#comment-10898</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Brooks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Nov 2006 20:29:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://waldo.jaquith.org/blog/2006/10/stark-allen-fight/#comment-10898</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Were those filthy words an ‘illuminative quote” from one of Webb’s porno works? Will Webb have the guts to apologize for these apparent criminal acts of his agent provocateur&lt;/blockquote&gt;

mdcraig,

Contrary to what you and the rest of the right wing thinks, not every Democrat in the Commonwealth is on Webb&#039;s payroll. I myself, lowly volunteer that I am, have never received any money from Mr. Webb. It didn&#039;t stop me from volunteering. If what you say &lt;i&gt;were&lt;/i&gt; true, then you would be an employee of Karl Rove or George Allen or Bob McDonnell.

And if you still think that novelists are who they write about, then I hope you get some reasoning help from someone. Mr Webb&#039;s novels are just that, fiction informed by real-life experiences.

God I am getting tired of having to repeat this over and over. I agree with Waldo though, when I say keep spewing this nonsense, it works well for Jim Webb.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Were those filthy words an ‘illuminative quote” from one of Webb’s porno works? Will Webb have the guts to apologize for these apparent criminal acts of his agent provocateur</p></blockquote>
<p>mdcraig,</p>
<p>Contrary to what you and the rest of the right wing thinks, not every Democrat in the Commonwealth is on Webb&#8217;s payroll. I myself, lowly volunteer that I am, have never received any money from Mr. Webb. It didn&#8217;t stop me from volunteering. If what you say <i>were</i> true, then you would be an employee of Karl Rove or George Allen or Bob McDonnell.</p>
<p>And if you still think that novelists are who they write about, then I hope you get some reasoning help from someone. Mr Webb&#8217;s novels are just that, fiction informed by real-life experiences.</p>
<p>God I am getting tired of having to repeat this over and over. I agree with Waldo though, when I say keep spewing this nonsense, it works well for Jim Webb.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Waldo Jaquith</title>
		<link>http://waldo.jaquith.org/blog/2006/10/stark-allen-assault/#comment-10897</link>
		<dc:creator>Waldo Jaquith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Nov 2006 19:14:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://waldo.jaquith.org/blog/2006/10/stark-allen-fight/#comment-10897</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Apparent known stalker menacingly charges public servant engaged in campaign of ideas, screaming and knocking into several bystanders. When this ‘trained killer’ refuses to cease his attempted assault, he escalates the physical violence with those justifiably trying to remove him. Finally subdued and shown the door, he mutters ‘punk’.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Dude, I have &lt;em&gt;got&lt;/em&gt; to see this video.  It sounds like a great one.  Where could I find it?

&lt;blockquote&gt;Were those filthy words an ‘illuminative quote” from one of Webb’s porno works?&lt;/blockquote&gt;

That is &lt;em&gt;awesome&lt;/em&gt;.  Please, by all means, &lt;a href=&quot;/blog/2006/10/cnn-webb-50/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;keep repeating it&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Apparent known stalker menacingly charges public servant engaged in campaign of ideas, screaming and knocking into several bystanders. When this ‘trained killer’ refuses to cease his attempted assault, he escalates the physical violence with those justifiably trying to remove him. Finally subdued and shown the door, he mutters ‘punk’.</p></blockquote>
<p>Dude, I have <em>got</em> to see this video.  It sounds like a great one.  Where could I find it?</p>
<blockquote><p>Were those filthy words an ‘illuminative quote” from one of Webb’s porno works?</p></blockquote>
<p>That is <em>awesome</em>.  Please, by all means, <a href="/blog/2006/10/cnn-webb-50/">keep repeating it</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kagro X</title>
		<link>http://waldo.jaquith.org/blog/2006/10/stark-allen-assault/#comment-10896</link>
		<dc:creator>Kagro X</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Nov 2006 18:51:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://waldo.jaquith.org/blog/2006/10/stark-allen-fight/#comment-10896</guid>
		<description>He escalates? Stark? Where? On what planet?

And the &quot;punk&quot; comment came from your boys, not Stark.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>He escalates? Stark? Where? On what planet?</p>
<p>And the &#8220;punk&#8221; comment came from your boys, not Stark.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mdcraig</title>
		<link>http://waldo.jaquith.org/blog/2006/10/stark-allen-assault/#comment-10895</link>
		<dc:creator>mdcraig</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Nov 2006 18:37:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://waldo.jaquith.org/blog/2006/10/stark-allen-fight/#comment-10895</guid>
		<description>Awoken this morning by radio alarm with local yokel &#039;news&#039; guy parroting dem talking points about &#039;stalking stark&#039; incident.  Then the first article I found was AP/bob lewis breathlessly reporting about serious-sounding &#039;chokehold&#039; occurrence.  Uh-oh!  Citizen-journalist.  Vet!!  Ex-Marine!!!  It certainly sounded important.  Upon closer look, however, including at the video: 

Apparent known stalker menacingly charges public servant engaged in campaign of ideas, screaming and knocking into several bystanders.  When this &#039;trained killer&#039; refuses to cease his attempted assault, he escalates the physical violence with those justifiably trying to remove him.  Finally subdued and shown the door, he mutters &#039;punk&#039;.  

I think Kerry was wrong and mean-spirited when he maligned our brave troops, stating that servicemembers don&#039;t &quot;make the most of it&quot; (education), don&#039;t &quot;study hard, ...do... homework and ...make an effort to be smart&quot;.  But these demeaning words would seem to apply to Stark. 

Stark&#039;s website gives some clues about his depth of committment to and definition of free speech.  There he advises one to &quot;study the terrain carefully before you join the battle&quot;, the final step being the &#039;showdown&quot;.  We see in the video Stark studying the terrain as he careened through innocents in his attempt to assault Allen.  This (one-man) mob rule is what goes for intellectual discourse for liberals.  

It seems that Stark&#039;s only other claim to fame is waving a poster with lurid words on it in front of a live-television camera during family hour.  Another example of liberals&#039; engagement in the realm of ideas.  Were those filthy words an &#039;illuminative quote&quot; from one of Webb&#039;s porno works?  Will Webb have the guts to apologize for these apparent criminal acts of his agent provocateur</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Awoken this morning by radio alarm with local yokel &#8216;news&#8217; guy parroting dem talking points about &#8217;stalking stark&#8217; incident.  Then the first article I found was AP/bob lewis breathlessly reporting about serious-sounding &#8216;chokehold&#8217; occurrence.  Uh-oh!  Citizen-journalist.  Vet!!  Ex-Marine!!!  It certainly sounded important.  Upon closer look, however, including at the video: </p>
<p>Apparent known stalker menacingly charges public servant engaged in campaign of ideas, screaming and knocking into several bystanders.  When this &#8216;trained killer&#8217; refuses to cease his attempted assault, he escalates the physical violence with those justifiably trying to remove him.  Finally subdued and shown the door, he mutters &#8216;punk&#8217;.  </p>
<p>I think Kerry was wrong and mean-spirited when he maligned our brave troops, stating that servicemembers don&#8217;t &#8220;make the most of it&#8221; (education), don&#8217;t &#8220;study hard, &#8230;do&#8230; homework and &#8230;make an effort to be smart&#8221;.  But these demeaning words would seem to apply to Stark. </p>
<p>Stark&#8217;s website gives some clues about his depth of committment to and definition of free speech.  There he advises one to &#8220;study the terrain carefully before you join the battle&#8221;, the final step being the &#8217;showdown&#8221;.  We see in the video Stark studying the terrain as he careened through innocents in his attempt to assault Allen.  This (one-man) mob rule is what goes for intellectual discourse for liberals.  </p>
<p>It seems that Stark&#8217;s only other claim to fame is waving a poster with lurid words on it in front of a live-television camera during family hour.  Another example of liberals&#8217; engagement in the realm of ideas.  Were those filthy words an &#8216;illuminative quote&#8221; from one of Webb&#8217;s porno works?  Will Webb have the guts to apologize for these apparent criminal acts of his agent provocateur</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Brooks</title>
		<link>http://waldo.jaquith.org/blog/2006/10/stark-allen-assault/#comment-10892</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Brooks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Nov 2006 17:45:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://waldo.jaquith.org/blog/2006/10/stark-allen-fight/#comment-10892</guid>
		<description>Nothing says sympathy like watching while supporters (employees?) throw someone to the floor, before he even gets a chance to ask a question. Then again, the rightwingers do like pre-emptive strikes. Just look at Iraq.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nothing says sympathy like watching while supporters (employees?) throw someone to the floor, before he even gets a chance to ask a question. Then again, the rightwingers do like pre-emptive strikes. Just look at Iraq.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kagro X</title>
		<link>http://waldo.jaquith.org/blog/2006/10/stark-allen-assault/#comment-10888</link>
		<dc:creator>Kagro X</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Nov 2006 16:21:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://waldo.jaquith.org/blog/2006/10/stark-allen-fight/#comment-10888</guid>
		<description>Ha ha! Yeah! That headlock really tugs at my heartstrings!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ha ha! Yeah! That headlock really tugs at my heartstrings!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ikeaboy</title>
		<link>http://waldo.jaquith.org/blog/2006/10/stark-allen-assault/#comment-10877</link>
		<dc:creator>ikeaboy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Nov 2006 15:15:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://waldo.jaquith.org/blog/2006/10/stark-allen-fight/#comment-10877</guid>
		<description>Nice going, Mike.  In your own self-righteous way you managed to make George Allen look sympathetic, something his campaign has been struggling to do for the last two months.

I&#039;m against most things George Allen favors but no candidate should have to put up with being stalked by nut jobs on a mission, be they left or right wing. Mike must not be attending class much at U VA Law or his critical thinking skills would be a bit sharper. If the records of Allen&#039;s divorce are sealed they are by definition not public record.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice going, Mike.  In your own self-righteous way you managed to make George Allen look sympathetic, something his campaign has been struggling to do for the last two months.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m against most things George Allen favors but no candidate should have to put up with being stalked by nut jobs on a mission, be they left or right wing. Mike must not be attending class much at U VA Law or his critical thinking skills would be a bit sharper. If the records of Allen&#8217;s divorce are sealed they are by definition not public record.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim Anderson</title>
		<link>http://waldo.jaquith.org/blog/2006/10/stark-allen-assault/#comment-10858</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim Anderson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Nov 2006 04:24:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://waldo.jaquith.org/blog/2006/10/stark-allen-fight/#comment-10858</guid>
		<description>Quote: there’s no such thing as a “former Marine”

Not true. I work in a military command staffed by about 50% active duty military, 50% civilian. Many of the civilians (including myself, a &quot;former Naval person&quot;) are retired military, including retired USMC. We have a small active-duty Marine contingent, who this week just sent out invitations to &quot;all Marines and Former Marines&quot; to come participate in the cutting of the cake for the Marine Corps Birthday. The former Marine who occupies the desk next to me affirms he&#039;s a former Marine - particularly since he&#039;s now an Army officer. He seems pretty convinced he&#039;s no longer a Marine, but is verfy proud to call himself a former Marine. One of my colleagues who just retired USMC says he&#039;s also a former Marine. What they all do say that there&#039;s no such thing as is an &quot;ex-Marine.&quot; Small point but important to some of us.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Quote: there’s no such thing as a “former Marine”</p>
<p>Not true. I work in a military command staffed by about 50% active duty military, 50% civilian. Many of the civilians (including myself, a &#8220;former Naval person&#8221;) are retired military, including retired USMC. We have a small active-duty Marine contingent, who this week just sent out invitations to &#8220;all Marines and Former Marines&#8221; to come participate in the cutting of the cake for the Marine Corps Birthday. The former Marine who occupies the desk next to me affirms he&#8217;s a former Marine &#8211; particularly since he&#8217;s now an Army officer. He seems pretty convinced he&#8217;s no longer a Marine, but is verfy proud to call himself a former Marine. One of my colleagues who just retired USMC says he&#8217;s also a former Marine. What they all do say that there&#8217;s no such thing as is an &#8220;ex-Marine.&#8221; Small point but important to some of us.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: NOVA Scout</title>
		<link>http://waldo.jaquith.org/blog/2006/10/stark-allen-assault/#comment-10854</link>
		<dc:creator>NOVA Scout</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Nov 2006 03:43:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://waldo.jaquith.org/blog/2006/10/stark-allen-fight/#comment-10854</guid>
		<description>JPTERP:  there&#039;s no such thing as a &quot;former Marine&quot;  If Mr. Stark or Mr. Webb or anyone else ever was a Marine, they are Marines.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>JPTERP:  there&#8217;s no such thing as a &#8220;former Marine&#8221;  If Mr. Stark or Mr. Webb or anyone else ever was a Marine, they are Marines.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin</title>
		<link>http://waldo.jaquith.org/blog/2006/10/stark-allen-assault/#comment-10848</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Nov 2006 02:20:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://waldo.jaquith.org/blog/2006/10/stark-allen-fight/#comment-10848</guid>
		<description>Why wasn&#039;t there a rush to get security or some sort of police officer there? The CNN video is inconclusive too about the origins of the fight and who threw first although it seems as if Stark is on the defensive most of the time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why wasn&#8217;t there a rush to get security or some sort of police officer there? The CNN video is inconclusive too about the origins of the fight and who threw first although it seems as if Stark is on the defensive most of the time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Harry Landers</title>
		<link>http://waldo.jaquith.org/blog/2006/10/stark-allen-assault/#comment-10846</link>
		<dc:creator>Harry Landers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Nov 2006 01:52:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://waldo.jaquith.org/blog/2006/10/stark-allen-fight/#comment-10846</guid>
		<description>&lt;em&gt;Apparently Mr. Stark writes on his own website that he has wanted to “Roger and Me” Allen.&lt;/em&gt;

And, the problem with this is...? I think the point of &quot;Roger and Me&quot; was to ask embarrassing questions of big shots. People who are usually so surrounded by accolytes and yes-men, that they never hear such questions. Sure, it&#039;s rude. Sure, it&#039;s boorish. Nope, I wouldn&#039;t want anybody asking me questions like that. But, when you&#039;re playing in the big leagues, you ought to be able to handle these situations with grace.

George Allen failed that test. He, once again, came off looking like a bully (who has his goons to do his dirty work for him). He could have been a better man.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>Apparently Mr. Stark writes on his own website that he has wanted to “Roger and Me” Allen.</em></p>
<p>And, the problem with this is&#8230;? I think the point of &#8220;Roger and Me&#8221; was to ask embarrassing questions of big shots. People who are usually so surrounded by accolytes and yes-men, that they never hear such questions. Sure, it&#8217;s rude. Sure, it&#8217;s boorish. Nope, I wouldn&#8217;t want anybody asking me questions like that. But, when you&#8217;re playing in the big leagues, you ought to be able to handle these situations with grace.</p>
<p>George Allen failed that test. He, once again, came off looking like a bully (who has his goons to do his dirty work for him). He could have been a better man.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott Nolan</title>
		<link>http://waldo.jaquith.org/blog/2006/10/stark-allen-assault/#comment-10842</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott Nolan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Nov 2006 00:44:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://waldo.jaquith.org/blog/2006/10/stark-allen-fight/#comment-10842</guid>
		<description>There is a little longer video online at the CNN site:
http://www.cnn.com/2006/POLITICS/10/31/allen.heckler.ap/index.html

That video starts with some staffers pushing the heckler/questioner out through what I presume to be the ballroom door into the lobby where the assault takes place.

Waldo, I gotta admit; it looks to me like the media is NOT being complete in it&#039;s reporting because it is very clear from the longer video that something physical happened BEFORE the assault in the lobby.  At the very least Allen&#039;s staffers/supporters were already pushing Stark out of the ballroom, but there may very well have been an altercation in the ballroom before that.

On the other hand, I find it extremely weird that if this guy was already physical with Allen or his staff, why on earth would they push him out of the ballroom and &lt;i&gt;into the lobby where Senator Allen had already moved&lt;/i&gt;?  That runs contrary to all protective service practices and common sense.  If Allen stepped out of the room, and if Stark was already physical then they should have tried to keep him &lt;i&gt;in the ballroom&lt;/i&gt; and away from the senator(s) until police arrived.  They did not do that, so my guess is that he&#039;d not been physical and was only very aggressive in his verbal questioning.  Aggressive enough to cause them to force him from the room physically?

I was not there; just expressing a view of the video I am seeing that is not already being examined.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is a little longer video online at the CNN site:<br />
<a href="http://www.cnn.com/2006/POLITICS/10/31/allen.heckler.ap/index.html">http://www.cnn.com/2006/POLITICS/10/31/allen.heckler.ap/index.html</a></p>
<p>That video starts with some staffers pushing the heckler/questioner out through what I presume to be the ballroom door into the lobby where the assault takes place.</p>
<p>Waldo, I gotta admit; it looks to me like the media is NOT being complete in it&#8217;s reporting because it is very clear from the longer video that something physical happened BEFORE the assault in the lobby.  At the very least Allen&#8217;s staffers/supporters were already pushing Stark out of the ballroom, but there may very well have been an altercation in the ballroom before that.</p>
<p>On the other hand, I find it extremely weird that if this guy was already physical with Allen or his staff, why on earth would they push him out of the ballroom and <i>into the lobby where Senator Allen had already moved</i>?  That runs contrary to all protective service practices and common sense.  If Allen stepped out of the room, and if Stark was already physical then they should have tried to keep him <i>in the ballroom</i> and away from the senator(s) until police arrived.  They did not do that, so my guess is that he&#8217;d not been physical and was only very aggressive in his verbal questioning.  Aggressive enough to cause them to force him from the room physically?</p>
<p>I was not there; just expressing a view of the video I am seeing that is not already being examined.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Waldo Jaquith</title>
		<link>http://waldo.jaquith.org/blog/2006/10/stark-allen-assault/#comment-10838</link>
		<dc:creator>Waldo Jaquith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Nov 2006 00:11:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://waldo.jaquith.org/blog/2006/10/stark-allen-fight/#comment-10838</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Waldo, what you failed to mention about the Hook report is that Dan Allen says that he was &quot;slammed into a door&quot; by Stark at exactly the same place (the ballroom door) as I reported the scuffle.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Hey, Tom?  If punches were thrown at that point, why wouldn&#039;t Dan Allen have mentioned it to The Hook?  He chooses to only say that he was &quot;slammed into a door,&quot; which differs from &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.tommccrystal.com/2006/10/31/webb-staffers-are-thugs/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;your account&lt;/a&gt; that Stark threw &quot;a mis-aimed punch into the crowd&quot; &quot;as he went through the door into the hallway.&quot;  Is it possible that you are mistaken in what you saw?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Waldo, what you failed to mention about the Hook report is that Dan Allen says that he was &#8220;slammed into a door&#8221; by Stark at exactly the same place (the ballroom door) as I reported the scuffle.</p></blockquote>
<p>Hey, Tom?  If punches were thrown at that point, why wouldn&#8217;t Dan Allen have mentioned it to The Hook?  He chooses to only say that he was &#8220;slammed into a door,&#8221; which differs from <a href="http://www.tommccrystal.com/2006/10/31/webb-staffers-are-thugs/">your account</a> that Stark threw &#8220;a mis-aimed punch into the crowd&#8221; &#8220;as he went through the door into the hallway.&#8221;  Is it possible that you are mistaken in what you saw?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
