<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: El himno nacional de los Estados Unidos.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://waldo.jaquith.org/blog/2006/05/bush-anthem-spanish/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://waldo.jaquith.org/blog/2006/05/bush-anthem-spanish/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 17:43:05 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Maura</title>
		<link>http://waldo.jaquith.org/blog/2006/05/bush-anthem-spanish/#comment-7928</link>
		<dc:creator>Maura</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 May 2006 19:04:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://waldo.jaquith.org/blog/2006/05/bush-anthem-spanish/#comment-7928</guid>
		<description>What percentage of those media outlets who reported on George W. Bush&#039;s &quot;opposition&quot; to the national anthem in Spanish will now report the fact that he himself gleefully sung a version of the anthem in Spanish when it suited his political purposes?

What percentage of the pundits who praised Bush for his &quot;stand&quot; on the &quot;anthem issue&quot; will now call him a flip-flopper, a political opportunist who &quot;supported&quot; the Spanish version of the anthem when it suited his political goals, but who now &quot;opposes&quot; it because that opposition suits his political agenda now?

Um...my bet?  Zero percent.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What percentage of those media outlets who reported on George W. Bush&#8217;s &#8220;opposition&#8221; to the national anthem in Spanish will now report the fact that he himself gleefully sung a version of the anthem in Spanish when it suited his political purposes?</p>
<p>What percentage of the pundits who praised Bush for his &#8220;stand&#8221; on the &#8220;anthem issue&#8221; will now call him a flip-flopper, a political opportunist who &#8220;supported&#8221; the Spanish version of the anthem when it suited his political goals, but who now &#8220;opposes&#8221; it because that opposition suits his political agenda now?</p>
<p>Um&#8230;my bet?  Zero percent.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim E-H</title>
		<link>http://waldo.jaquith.org/blog/2006/05/bush-anthem-spanish/#comment-7923</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim E-H</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 May 2006 17:56:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://waldo.jaquith.org/blog/2006/05/bush-anthem-spanish/#comment-7923</guid>
		<description>With the current political team, if some manufactured &quot;outrage&quot; makes some people&#039;s blood boil, it&#039;s a safe bet that&#039;s the only part of it they care about.  Accuracy, honesty, consistency -- those never enter into it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With the current political team, if some manufactured &#8220;outrage&#8221; makes some people&#8217;s blood boil, it&#8217;s a safe bet that&#8217;s the only part of it they care about.  Accuracy, honesty, consistency &#8212; those never enter into it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
