<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: RSS for total newbies.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://waldo.jaquith.org/blog/2006/01/rss-intro/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://waldo.jaquith.org/blog/2006/01/rss-intro/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 17:56:51 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Corey</title>
		<link>http://waldo.jaquith.org/blog/2006/01/rss-intro/#comment-5467</link>
		<dc:creator>Corey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2006 19:36:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://waldo.jaquith.org/blog/2006/01/rss-intro/#comment-5467</guid>
		<description>I took many readers for a test run in the past week after I read this article and realized there is much more beyond the Google RSS reader I was using.  I finally settled on Feeddemon. Newsgator is very sketchy, but the speed and &quot;river of news&quot; reading style placed it above the rest.  Nothing in the EULA seemed to indicate any sort of spyware.  

As a side note, many of the Mac versions looked very good, but I&#039;m stuck with Windows.    :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I took many readers for a test run in the past week after I read this article and realized there is much more beyond the Google RSS reader I was using.  I finally settled on Feeddemon. Newsgator is very sketchy, but the speed and &#8220;river of news&#8221; reading style placed it above the rest.  Nothing in the EULA seemed to indicate any sort of spyware.  </p>
<p>As a side note, many of the Mac versions looked very good, but I&#8217;m stuck with Windows.    :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Waldo Jaquith</title>
		<link>http://waldo.jaquith.org/blog/2006/01/rss-intro/#comment-5391</link>
		<dc:creator>Waldo Jaquith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jan 2006 04:32:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://waldo.jaquith.org/blog/2006/01/rss-intro/#comment-5391</guid>
		<description>Firstly, I corrected that NewsFire URL -- thanks for that.  Secondly, I totally forgot about NetNewsWire Lite -- I&#039;ve added a bit about that now, thank you.

On the topic of discussion, I don&#039;t know &lt;em&gt;why&lt;/em&gt; I left out Thunderbird, but I left out Firefox because I&#039;ve only known about its &quot;Live Bookmarks&quot; function, which is definitely clever, but not an RSS reader in a particularly useful sense.  I never knew about the Sage extension, though, Richard -- I&#039;ll definitely have to play with that.

I&#039;ve provided an update that suggests that Thunderbird users just use its RSS functions.  Thunderbird adoption rates are sufficiently low right now that I strongly suspect that anybody using it is of a technical skill level that makes them already familiar with RSS.  Frankly, I think most Windows users would be best off switching their e-mail to Thunderbird and getting an aggregator while they&#039;re at it, but that&#039;s a different discussion altogether. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Firstly, I corrected that NewsFire URL &#8212; thanks for that.  Secondly, I totally forgot about NetNewsWire Lite &#8212; I&#8217;ve added a bit about that now, thank you.</p>
<p>On the topic of discussion, I don&#8217;t know <em>why</em> I left out Thunderbird, but I left out Firefox because I&#8217;ve only known about its &#8220;Live Bookmarks&#8221; function, which is definitely clever, but not an RSS reader in a particularly useful sense.  I never knew about the Sage extension, though, Richard &#8212; I&#8217;ll definitely have to play with that.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve provided an update that suggests that Thunderbird users just use its RSS functions.  Thunderbird adoption rates are sufficiently low right now that I strongly suspect that anybody using it is of a technical skill level that makes them already familiar with RSS.  Frankly, I think most Windows users would be best off switching their e-mail to Thunderbird and getting an aggregator while they&#8217;re at it, but that&#8217;s a different discussion altogether. :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard Hubbard</title>
		<link>http://waldo.jaquith.org/blog/2006/01/rss-intro/#comment-5390</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard Hubbard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Jan 2006 21:49:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://waldo.jaquith.org/blog/2006/01/rss-intro/#comment-5390</guid>
		<description>Heh. I second Dan Bruno&#039;s comments. I was going to ask &lt;em&gt;&#039;what about Firefox or Thunderbird?&#039;&lt;/em&gt; but he beat me to it. In addition to the Live Bookmarks feature, there&#039;re also extensions for newsreading, such as Sage.

&lt;strong&gt;Firefox&lt;/strong&gt; and &lt;strong&gt;Thurnderbird &lt;/strong&gt;both live at http://www.mozilla.com/

The only bad Mozilla project is one that hasn&#039;t been made yet.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Heh. I second Dan Bruno&#8217;s comments. I was going to ask <em>&#8216;what about Firefox or Thunderbird?&#8217;</em> but he beat me to it. In addition to the Live Bookmarks feature, there&#8217;re also extensions for newsreading, such as Sage.</p>
<p><strong>Firefox</strong> and <strong>Thurnderbird </strong>both live at <a href="http://www.mozilla.com/">http://www.mozilla.com/</a></p>
<p>The only bad Mozilla project is one that hasn&#8217;t been made yet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan Bruno</title>
		<link>http://waldo.jaquith.org/blog/2006/01/rss-intro/#comment-5389</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan Bruno</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Jan 2006 04:57:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://waldo.jaquith.org/blog/2006/01/rss-intro/#comment-5389</guid>
		<description>Good summary.  Two things I would add:

1) There&#039;s a free version of NetNewsWire that is more than enough for most people.  (It&#039;s at the bottom of the NetNewsWire page, linked to above.)

2) You don&#039;t necessarily need to use a separate program.  Aside from the web-based readers like Bloglines, you can get extensions for Firefox that will add newsreading capabilities, or use the email client Thunderbird.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good summary.  Two things I would add:</p>
<p>1) There&#8217;s a free version of NetNewsWire that is more than enough for most people.  (It&#8217;s at the bottom of the NetNewsWire page, linked to above.)</p>
<p>2) You don&#8217;t necessarily need to use a separate program.  Aside from the web-based readers like Bloglines, you can get extensions for Firefox that will add newsreading capabilities, or use the email client Thunderbird.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Central VA real estate news, trends and opinions</title>
		<link>http://waldo.jaquith.org/blog/2006/01/rss-intro/#comment-5388</link>
		<dc:creator>Central VA real estate news, trends and opinions</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Jan 2006 02:08:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://waldo.jaquith.org/blog/2006/01/rss-intro/#comment-5388</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;RSS for Dummies...&lt;/strong&gt;

	I&#8217;ve said it before and I&#8217;ll say it again - RSS is fundamental to the future of the business web.  Now Waldo has posted an excellent &#8220;RSS for Dummies.&#8221;

......</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>RSS for Dummies&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>	I&#8217;ve said it before and I&#8217;ll say it again &#8211; RSS is fundamental to the future of the business web.  Now Waldo has posted an excellent &#8220;RSS for Dummies.&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8230;&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: andrew&#8217;s blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; RSS for total newbies.</title>
		<link>http://waldo.jaquith.org/blog/2006/01/rss-intro/#comment-5387</link>
		<dc:creator>andrew&#8217;s blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; RSS for total newbies.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Jan 2006 21:39:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://waldo.jaquith.org/blog/2006/01/rss-intro/#comment-5387</guid>
		<description>[...] Waldo Jaquith » Blog Archive » RSS for total newbies. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Waldo Jaquith » Blog Archive » RSS for total newbies. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CR UVa</title>
		<link>http://waldo.jaquith.org/blog/2006/01/rss-intro/#comment-5386</link>
		<dc:creator>CR UVa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Jan 2006 19:12:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://waldo.jaquith.org/blog/2006/01/rss-intro/#comment-5386</guid>
		<description>One thing that I do not yet understand is why browsers with RSS are generally shunned.  What kind of advantages do seperate programs have?  (And I find the Safari feed to be more than sufficient, even though I find one preference set on it does not seem to stay set)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One thing that I do not yet understand is why browsers with RSS are generally shunned.  What kind of advantages do seperate programs have?  (And I find the Safari feed to be more than sufficient, even though I find one preference set on it does not seem to stay set)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Janis Jaquith</title>
		<link>http://waldo.jaquith.org/blog/2006/01/rss-intro/#comment-5384</link>
		<dc:creator>Janis Jaquith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Jan 2006 15:44:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://waldo.jaquith.org/blog/2006/01/rss-intro/#comment-5384</guid>
		<description>The URL for NewsFire is http://www.newsfirerss.com/ (The link Waldo gave omits the &quot;rss&quot;, that&#039;s why it doesn&#039;t work.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The URL for NewsFire is <a href="http://www.newsfirerss.com/">http://www.newsfirerss.com/</a> (The link Waldo gave omits the &#8220;rss&#8221;, that&#8217;s why it doesn&#8217;t work.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
