Waldo Jaquith

House Appropriations public hearing.

As planned, I’m spending the day at the General Assembly. As I write this, I’m perched on a chair in the back of House Room D, where a finance committee hearing on the budget has just begun. A half dozen people have spoken before the committee thus far, all of whom are caretakers for disabled individuals, generally children, and they have pleaded for state funding that will make it possible for their dependents to be cared for.

Audience Members at the House Finance CommitteeSuch is the nature of family healthcare that the packed room is largely full of women, many of whom have physically or mentally disabled children in tow. Consequently, the speechifying is punctuated by outbursts from those too young or developmentally disabled to know that neither shouting nor moaning are normally tolerated in these chambers.

The testimony is heart-wrenching. One woman, a single mother, choked up repeatedly while attempting to explain her situation. She’s a school bus driver, and her son, of high school age, is severely developmentally disabled. He attends high school, but his inability to regulate his own behavior or understand what constitutes normal behavior requires his mother to come fetch him on a pretty regular basis. Her salary does not permit her to hire a caretaker for him, and the regularity with which she needs to miss work to care for him has left her in a tough spot. She’s at an impasse; she can’t keep her job if she has to keep leaving, but she can’t keep a roof over their head if she is unemployed. She would just like the General Assembly to provide the funding that would make it possible for her son to have some sort of care that would enable her to work.

House Finance CommitteeSeveral of the speakers are mentally disabled. They have slowly, cautiously told their stories about how they were regular people, sustained a brain injury or developed a degenerative disease, and have since struggled to live a normal life. One person has been completely impossible to understand, but most have gotten their message across well. One girl, a nineteen-year-old, explained that she had an accident several years ago that left her with a brain injury. She couldn’t make it through high school, but she got her GED and is now in community college. She struggles, but has found that she can do well with the help of an aide (presumably taking notes, helping her from class to class, organizing her work, etc.) The trouble is that she can’t afford much money for an aide, and so she’s having a difficult time getting competent help. She asked for just a little bit of money so that she can afford to get better help.

Most of the members of the committee are paying close attention to this occasionally-riviting testimony, some 45 minutes into it, though Del. Watkins Abbitt is more absorbed in his laptop. Most members have, at times, traded a few words with the person next to them, or put on their reading glasses and studied something on their desk. The Richmond Times-Dispatch’s Jeff Schapiro has spent the duration at the front of the room, leaning over the counter and looking rakish.

Disabled AdvocatesThere’s an odd duality to the event. On the one hand, many of the speakers are pouring their hearts out, confessing to their deepest struggles and pleading for just a little bit of help to avoid becoming completely reliant on public services or, worse, homeless. On the other hand, the passivity of the elected officials has made me feel — rightly or wrongly — that surely this is what they hear ever single day. Surely they cannot help but become numbed to this sort of testimony over time. I’ve only been sitting here for an hour, and I’m already finding that I’m tuning some people out. I wonder how many of these representatives already know how they’re going to vote on regulated budgetary matters, and to whom this testimony is consequently useless. It must be a very difficult thing for many in the audience to come to the General Assembly, given the nature of their disabilities and, indeed, the simple cost of traveling from the far reaches of the state. (In fact, most people are leaving after they speak.)

I’m on the knife’s edge of boredom. When I pay attention, I’m often fascinated. Yet I keep tuning out, perhaps as a defense mechanism. These stories are sad, and I can’t help these people. It’s tremendously frustrating to listen to, and I think it’s easier to dismiss them and their concerns as being none of my own.

I’m one head injury away from being in the same situation as anybody in this room. There but for the grace of God go I.


12 Comments

Welcome to the place where reporters and elected folks live. More than enough heartbreak to go around, but limited resources to deal with it. And so you have to turn off a little bit of your humanity to keep from being overwhelmed by it all.

Hang tough. Go down to Chickens and get something to eat.

Posted by Valley Redneck on 18 January 2006 @ 2pm

Your suggestion is such a good one that I preemptively took you up on it — Chris Piper, of the SBE, introduced me to it. I had the Patrick Henry and a limeade. Gotta love the limeade.

“Chickens.” What a name.

Posted by Waldo Jaquith on 18 January 2006 @ 2pm

Don’t miss the cafeteria on the 6th floor, either. Not great food, but great gossip and a stellar view on a clear day.

Posted by Valley Redneck on 18 January 2006 @ 3pm

Waldo, are there any pages in the committee rooms? If you’re looking for someone who can testify to the jaded nature of most legislators (or just for some interesting perspective), track down a page who has served in a committee covering health and human services. I was a page in the Ohio House of Reps for two years and sat through many committees, and the frustration never left. Your suspicion is correct; legislators (and pages) have heard it all. The hardest part, as you have illustrated, is knowing that so many just need a little help to survive but having no power to provide it.

Posted by Kat on 18 January 2006 @ 3pm

Hey you write good.

You should submit this to the VBC, conspicuously hosted somewhere next week…

Also, I think that sort of situation would kill my idealist heart.

Posted by Ross on 18 January 2006 @ 4pm

What I found most distracting when I went to the House Finance Committee meeting on Monday was the little coterie of lobbyists that hung out on one side of the back of the room, whispering and giggling. God knows why or about what.

Posted by J.C. Wilmore on 18 January 2006 @ 4pm

In Mississippi, we have shouting and moaning in the Chambers all the time. Must be a Southern thang.

(And at least your experience should remind you to strap on your helmet before rollerblading!)

Posted by Shawn Lea on 18 January 2006 @ 6pm

This is one of the best posts I’ve read in the Virginia blogosphere over the last two years!

Posted by Kevin on 18 January 2006 @ 6pm

I attended and reported on the full scope of the earlier hearing in Northern Virginia (nb–I believe its the Joint Allocations Committee, not the Finance Committee):

http://www.raisingkaine.com/1561

The burning issue at these hearings appears to be whether Warner’s proposed investment to rennovate mental health facilities and invest in ancillary care will actually get enacted–or cut. By law, something has to be done. How it happens is the subject of debate. Ultimately, the families of these chronically disabled patients want good. care–something that may not be reliable if the GA decides to take a cheaper option, like burying these folks in nursing homes.

Posted by Mary on 19 January 2006 @ 10am

FYI,

“Chicken’s Snack Bar” was named for its original proprieter, the late Louise “Chicken” Oliff, who ran the lunch counter in the Capitol building for years.

Posted by Mike Rafone on 19 January 2006 @ 1pm

Waldo, is it possible to record these proceedings? There is more heartbreak than we know what to do with using existing media channels, but making these presentations available as podcasts would serve as aural records of what these individuals had to say.

Posted by Sean Tubbs on 22 January 2006 @ 12pm

If I had a press pass, had access to their audio feed room, and they had a feed from that room. You know how little that I know about audio but, that said, I’m not confident that a mic would pick up their comments from within the room.

Posted by Waldo Jaquith on 22 January 2006 @ 12pm