<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Kilgore dithers on abortion.  Kaine nails him.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://waldo.jaquith.org/blog/2005/07/kilgore-abortion-audio/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://waldo.jaquith.org/blog/2005/07/kilgore-abortion-audio/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 17:43:05 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Raising Kaine &#187; Kilgore Campaign: Anti-Gay personal attacks are &#8220;out of bounds&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://waldo.jaquith.org/blog/2005/07/kilgore-abortion-audio/#comment-1886</link>
		<dc:creator>Raising Kaine &#187; Kilgore Campaign: Anti-Gay personal attacks are &#8220;out of bounds&#8221;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Jul 2005 09:49:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://waldo.jaquith.org/blog/2005/07/kilgore-abortion-audio/#comment-1886</guid>
		<description>[...] The weirdest thing about this statement is what it is responding to: a fundraising letter by Chesterfield Republican delegate, Bradley Marrs, criticizing his independent opponent, Katherine Waddell, for receiving a $10,000 check from a wealthy homosexual businessman. The Kilgore campaign rushing to attack homophobia and anti-gay bias? Can we say &#8220;out of character&#8221; or what? So why did they do it? Could it be, as the Richmond Times-Dispacth suggests, an attempt by the Kilgore campaign at a &#8220;softening&#8221; of their &#8220;use of social and cultural issues themes&#8221; that they have been employing regularly in order &#8220;to sharpen distinctions between [Kilgore] and Kaine?&#8221; Could it be a response to the latest Mason-Dixon poll, which shows Kilgore&#8217;s &#8220;negative&#8221; ratings the highest among the three major gubernatorial candidates - Tim Kaine (D), Russ Potts (I), and Jerry Kilgore (R)? Could it be the Kilgore campaign&#8217;s attempt to move away from the hard right and towards the political center? Or could it be yet another example of Jerry Kilgore&#8217;s muddled, waffling, or non-existent positions on the issues: abortion, taxes, referenda, the Warner/Kaine record, stem cells, Terry Schiavo, Confederate History and Heritage Month, and several others? [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The weirdest thing about this statement is what it is responding to: a fundraising letter by Chesterfield Republican delegate, Bradley Marrs, criticizing his independent opponent, Katherine Waddell, for receiving a $10,000 check from a wealthy homosexual businessman. The Kilgore campaign rushing to attack homophobia and anti-gay bias? Can we say &#8220;out of character&#8221; or what? So why did they do it? Could it be, as the Richmond Times-Dispacth suggests, an attempt by the Kilgore campaign at a &#8220;softening&#8221; of their &#8220;use of social and cultural issues themes&#8221; that they have been employing regularly in order &#8220;to sharpen distinctions between [Kilgore] and Kaine?&#8221; Could it be a response to the latest Mason-Dixon poll, which shows Kilgore&#8217;s &#8220;negative&#8221; ratings the highest among the three major gubernatorial candidates &#8211; Tim Kaine (D), Russ Potts (I), and Jerry Kilgore (R)? Could it be the Kilgore campaign&#8217;s attempt to move away from the hard right and towards the political center? Or could it be yet another example of Jerry Kilgore&#8217;s muddled, waffling, or non-existent positions on the issues: abortion, taxes, referenda, the Warner/Kaine record, stem cells, Terry Schiavo, Confederate History and Heritage Month, and several others? [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Raising Kaine &#187; &#8220;Roe v. Wade is the settled law of the land&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://waldo.jaquith.org/blog/2005/07/kilgore-abortion-audio/#comment-1815</link>
		<dc:creator>Raising Kaine &#187; &#8220;Roe v. Wade is the settled law of the land&#8221;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jul 2005 09:12:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://waldo.jaquith.org/blog/2005/07/kilgore-abortion-audio/#comment-1815</guid>
		<description>[...] And what about Jerry Kilgore? What is HIS position on abortion? That&#8217;s a good question, because Kilgore won&#8217;t really say in public. For instance, at the Greenbrier debate a couple of weekends ago, Kilgore refused to answer the &#8220;hypothetical&#8221; question, &#8220;If Roe v. Wade were overturned, and the General Assembly passed a bill further restricting abortion, would you sign it into law?&#8221; As Waldo Jaquith points out on his blog: What’s totally appalling&#8230;is that Kilgore thinks that abortion should be illegal, even in cases of rape and incest, unless the rape is reported within a week. That, of course, is long before the victim would know that she’s been impregnated by her rapist. (I don’t know what makes seven days so special.) Not a lot of 12-year-old girls go to the police after they’ve been raped by a parent of guardian. Kilgore would force this little girl to be pregnant, presumably ending her life as she knows it. You know, in case the rape itself wasn’t sufficiently traumatic. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] And what about Jerry Kilgore? What is HIS position on abortion? That&#8217;s a good question, because Kilgore won&#8217;t really say in public. For instance, at the Greenbrier debate a couple of weekends ago, Kilgore refused to answer the &#8220;hypothetical&#8221; question, &#8220;If Roe v. Wade were overturned, and the General Assembly passed a bill further restricting abortion, would you sign it into law?&#8221; As Waldo Jaquith points out on his blog: What’s totally appalling&#8230;is that Kilgore thinks that abortion should be illegal, even in cases of rape and incest, unless the rape is reported within a week. That, of course, is long before the victim would know that she’s been impregnated by her rapist. (I don’t know what makes seven days so special.) Not a lot of 12-year-old girls go to the police after they’ve been raped by a parent of guardian. Kilgore would force this little girl to be pregnant, presumably ending her life as she knows it. You know, in case the rape itself wasn’t sufficiently traumatic. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
