Comments on: Cav. Daily: The debates sucked.

By: Waldo Jaquith

Waldo Jaquith — Sat, 23 Jul 2005 03:06:00 +0000

I have never even heard of Purplesaurus Rex, but I am definitely getting some at the grocery store this weekend.

By: CR UVa

CR UVa — Sat, 23 Jul 2005 03:02:22 +0000

I agree with Cari. The CD is definitely more liberal, but the conservative columnists get more attention in general (at least, the letters to the editor seems to suggest this). Also, the Lead Editorial has always struck me as, at the very least, leaning liberal.

But Waldo, I have to disagree with you; Purplesaurus Rex would be better.

By: Waldo Jaquith

Waldo Jaquith — Fri, 22 Jul 2005 17:36:27 +0000

Mmm…Kool-Aid.

I’ve been out gardening in the hot sun. I think some Blue Raspberry Kool-Aid is in order. Thanks for the suggestion.

By: phyllis

phyllis — Fri, 22 Jul 2005 17:31:53 +0000

And one of those females is the most irrational, kool-aid drinking female columnist that I believe that I have ever read.
She is certifiable, I tell you.
And she is back this year.

By: Cari

Cari — Thu, 21 Jul 2005 22:14:05 +0000

Hahahah oh my lord.. I’d just like to thank you for directing all of the professors and political folk who read your blog to THIS of all posts. I should have known the traffic spike was bad news.

The Cav Daily board actually has more liberals these days, and so does the opinion page. People are used to thinking of the Cav Daily as conservative because in recent years, we’ve had a few REALLY conservative columnists that got a lot of attention. I certainly remember the offensive columns more than I remember any of the liberal columns that I agreed with. But overall, we have more liberal columnists than conservatives. But then again, we only have four women, and no black columnists.