Comments on: Goode’s contributions certainly look coerced. http://waldo.jaquith.org/blog/2005/06/goode-contributions-coerced/ Fri, 19 Mar 2010 03:04:20 -0700 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2 hourly 1 By: Waldo Jaquith http://waldo.jaquith.org/blog/2005/06/goode-contributions-coerced/#comment-1495 Waldo Jaquith Wed, 29 Jun 2005 19:20:33 +0000 http://waldo.jaquith.org/blog/2005/06/goode-contributions-coerced/#comment-1495 Gosh... *twists foot in dust on ground* Gosh…

*twists foot in dust on ground*

]]> By: phyllis http://waldo.jaquith.org/blog/2005/06/goode-contributions-coerced/#comment-1494 phyllis Wed, 29 Jun 2005 14:45:48 +0000 http://waldo.jaquith.org/blog/2005/06/goode-contributions-coerced/#comment-1494 Waldo- Great investigative reporting! As I have told you for years, your strength lies in having the instinct to see straight through to the heart of a issue and having the intellect, curiosity and energy to make it plain to all the rest of us. You could easily be the next Mike Wallace-whether in print or on the airways. And if you do not take that route, then you definitely will be one hell-raising politician. Waldo- Great investigative reporting!

As I have told you for years, your strength lies in having the instinct to see straight through to the heart of a issue and having the intellect, curiosity and energy to make it plain to all the rest of us.

You could easily be the next Mike Wallace-whether in print or on the airways. And if you do not take that route, then you definitely will be one hell-raising politician.

]]> By: Waldo Jaquith http://waldo.jaquith.org/blog/2005/06/goode-contributions-coerced/#comment-1491 Waldo Jaquith Wed, 29 Jun 2005 01:13:39 +0000 http://waldo.jaquith.org/blog/2005/06/goode-contributions-coerced/#comment-1491 Hey, you linked to me. That's how we award our own little Pulitzers in blogging. :) Hey, you linked to me. That’s how we award our own little Pulitzers in blogging. :)

]]> By: Lowell Feld http://waldo.jaquith.org/blog/2005/06/goode-contributions-coerced/#comment-1490 Lowell Feld Wed, 29 Jun 2005 01:09:54 +0000 http://waldo.jaquith.org/blog/2005/06/goode-contributions-coerced/#comment-1490 Can I nominate you for a blogging Pulitzer for this? IS there a blogging Pulitzer? :) Can I nominate you for a blogging Pulitzer for this? IS there a blogging Pulitzer? :)

]]> By: Waldo Jaquith http://waldo.jaquith.org/blog/2005/06/goode-contributions-coerced/#comment-1489 Waldo Jaquith Wed, 29 Jun 2005 01:07:33 +0000 http://waldo.jaquith.org/blog/2005/06/goode-contributions-coerced/#comment-1489 D'oh. Thanks, Lowell. I've reversed the titles of the two axes accordingly. D’oh. Thanks, Lowell. I’ve reversed the titles of the two axes accordingly.

]]> By: Lowell Feld http://waldo.jaquith.org/blog/2005/06/goode-contributions-coerced/#comment-1488 Lowell Feld Tue, 28 Jun 2005 23:30:30 +0000 http://waldo.jaquith.org/blog/2005/06/goode-contributions-coerced/#comment-1488 Wow! This is very impressive work and extremely powerful evidence against Goode. Great work, Waldo!! One quibble: on your first graph, you have "total income" on the y-axis, but your labels are dates. And you have "date" on the x-axis, but your labels are total income. Unless I'm missing something here... Wow! This is very impressive work and extremely powerful evidence against Goode. Great work, Waldo!!

One quibble: on your first graph, you have “total income” on the y-axis, but your labels are dates. And you have “date” on the x-axis, but your labels are total income. Unless I’m missing something here…

]]>